The Strangeness of Tragedy

By Paul Hammond

This booklet reads tragedy as a style within which the protagonist is estranged from the realm round him, and, displaced in time, area, and language, involves inhabit a milieu that's now not shared by way of different characters. This alienation from others additionally includes a decomposition of the integrity of the person, that's usually noticeable in tragedy's uncertainty in regards to the protagonists' autonomy: do they act, or do the gods act via them? the place are the bounds of the self, and the bounds of the human? After an introductory essay exploring the theatrical and linguistic capability through which the protagonist is made to inhabit an odd and singular global, the e-book devotes essays to performs from classical, renaissance, and neo-classical literature through Aeschylus, Sophocles, Seneca, Shakespeare, and Racine. shut realization is paid to the linguistic strangeness of the texts that is usually smoothed over by means of editors and translators, because it is thru the weirdness of tragic language that the deep estrangement of the characters is proven. for that reason, the Greek, Latin, and French texts are quoted within the originals, with translations additional, and a focus is paid to textual cruces which illustrate the linguistic and conceptual problems of those plays.

Show description

Quick preview of The Strangeness of Tragedy PDF

Show sample text content

7, ‘Fate in Sophocles’. 17 Oedipus the King, ll. 828–9. Oedipus seventy nine Even during this second of anguish the protest is carefully worded as a rhetorical query, with the accountability for accusing a few (unnamed) god being put first at the guy who's imagined as announcing this stuff, after which on those that agree that this kind of asserting will be correct; so Oedipus distances himself from this attribution of blame while he utters it, apprehensive to not offend extra through inopportune speech. The observe translated ‘deity’ here's äÆßìïíüò, and äÆßìøí has various meanings which mark out a space of uncertainty as Oedipus confronts the boundaries of his personal will: it could suggest a person god or goddess, and is typically used to prevent naming a god in conditions the place such speech will be unpropitious; it will possibly suggest the nice or evil genius of an individual or kin; or divine strength; or, specifically, the ability controlling an individual’s future, and for this reason one’s lot or fortune.

Seventy four Oresteia fifty nine divine, dwelling and useless, engage to result in the killing of Clytemnestra. issues, too, tackle different types of company via Aeschylean metaphor. Blood calls for extra blood, via a verb which denotes the motion of an importunate suppliant (ðæïóÆØôåEí: call for additionally, beg persistently). seventy eight And ‘because of blood tired by means of the fostering earth j the vengeful gore stands clotted, and won't dissolve away’. seventy nine The blood is tired or under the influence of alcohol up (KŒðïŁÝíŁš ) via the earth, and but it's also coagulated (ðÝðŪåí) and won't drain away (ïP äØÆææýäÆí); the blood itself takes vengeance (ôßôÆò).

14 Othello, I ii 21. ‘provulgate’ is the 4to interpreting; the Folio has ‘promulgate’ that's most likely a simplification of the rarer observe. The OED has simply examples of ‘provulgate’, now not together with this one. 15 Othello, II i 182–91. thirteen Othello 147 to dye’; ‘I feare . . . That’—so that whereas the primary thrust of the passage is an extravagant affirmation of happiness, the innovative strength is invested in eventualities of hurricane and demise and worry. What emerges so much forcefully is the foreboding instead of his content material, and he's, because it seems, correct in considering that ‘not one other convenience wish to this, j Succeedes in unknowne Fate’.

That’—so that whereas the important thrust of the passage is an extravagant affirmation of happiness, the resourceful energy is invested in eventualities of typhoon and loss of life and worry. What emerges such a lot forcefully is the foreboding instead of his content material, and he's, because it seems, correct in pondering that ‘not one other convenience wish to this, j Succeedes in unknowne Fate’. he's a fatally creative storyteller. The fertility of his brain is printed back while he says of Desdemona, instantly earlier than Iago starts his temptation scene: very good wretch: Perdition trap my Soule yet I do love thee: and while i admire thee now not, Chaos is come againe.

717–36; Sommerstein, p. 143. ninety six ninety seven Choephori, ll. 526–33. Eumenides, l. 1034. ninety eight Sommerstein’s translations and gloss, p. 283. ninety nine however the finishing isn't really with out unresolved parts: see (e. g. ) Vernand and Vidal-Naquet, i 25–7, n. three. ninety four 3 SOPHOCLES Electra S ophocles’ Electra is shadowed by means of the prior of the home of Atreus, a earlier which survives and is reshaped within the minds of its principals; particularly, in a departure from the emphasis within the Oresteia, the tragic milieu is the brain of Electra. in the beginning of the play the outdated slave’s speech establishes the environment as greater than the geographical Argos: ‘home’ is a fancy textile of biography and myth,1 for he recollects that it was once right here that he bought the boy Orestes from the palms of his sister and carried him to defense; yet this can be additionally where of Io and of Apollo; it's straight away wealthy in gold (ðïºıåæýóïıò) and wealthy in failures (ðïºýçŁïæüí).

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.17 of 5 – based on 21 votes